hunt.5280labColorado

GMU 133 Elk Report — 2026 season

4 limited hunt codes valid in this unit. CPW 2026 brochure, 2026 primary draw recap, 2025 harvest survey. Points: resident / nonresident.

Unit harvest trend (2023–2024)

YearHarvestHuntersSuccessRec. days
202317 (10 bulls / 7 cows)5829%297
202421 (16 bulls / 5 cows)8525%513
2023 Archery0180%78
2023 Muzzleloader030%8
2023 Rifle173745%212
2024 Archery72429%123
2024 Rifle146223%391
SeasonAntlered harvest / huntersSuccessAntlerless harvest / huntersSuccess
2023 Rifle10 / 2640%7 / 1256%
2024 Rifle10 / 3428%5 / 2717%

* CPW's antlered/antlerless tables do not include either-sex hunt codes.

All limited + over-the-counter hunters. CPW published unit-level tables for 2023 and 2024; the 2025 report has hunt-code totals only.

Every hunt code in the unit

DatesGMUsDrew out at (pts)Points 2023–2026
E-E-133-O1-MmuzzleloadereitherSept. 12–20133, 134, 141, 142A1080 (2nd)0Drawn-out-at points 2023–2026: resident 0/0/0/0, nonresident 0/-/0/0Resident 2023: 0Resident 2024: 0Resident 2025: 0Resident 2026: 0Nonresident 2023: 0Nonresident 2025: 0Nonresident 2026: 00/0/0/00/-/0/056%*4.0
E-F-133-O1-MLeftover likelymuzzleloaderfemaleSept. 12–20133, 134, 141, 142B80––Drawn-out-at points 2023–2026: resident -/0/0/-, nonresident –Resident 2024: 0Resident 2025: 0-/0/0/-–0%*–
E-F-133-L1-RriflefemaleOct. 24–Jan. 31 Late133, 134, 141B556100Drawn-out-at points 2023–2026: resident 0/0/0/0, nonresident 0/0/0/0Resident 2023: 0Resident 2024: 0Resident 2025: 0Resident 2026: 0Nonresident 2023: 0Nonresident 2024: 0Nonresident 2025: 0Nonresident 2026: 00/0/0/00/0/0/077%11.0
E-M-133-O4-RriflemaleNov. 18–22133, 134, 141, 142A30220 (2nd)0 (2nd)Drawn-out-at points 2023–2026: resident 0/0/0/0, nonresident 0/0/0/0Resident 2023: 0Resident 2024: 0Resident 2025: 0Resident 2026: 0Nonresident 2023: 0Nonresident 2024: 0Nonresident 2025: 0Nonresident 2026: 00/0/0/00/0/0/014%16.7

* Low sample: CPW flags these hunt codes "few hunters responded".

either +
either-sex license; + marks codes where an adult Colorado resident needed on average 6+ preference points to draw over the previous three draws (CPW brochure p.20). Up to 20% of these licenses may go to nonresidents (p.4).
0 (2nd)
the code filled with 2nd-choice applicants: every 1st-choice applicant drew, even with 0 points.

Near-sure draws (0–1 point in 2026)

Stackable tags (List B — can be held alongside a List A tag)

No List C hunts in this unit.

Leftover likely

These codes had licenses left over after the 2026 primary draw:E-F-133-O1-M.

With your points

Residency

Likely draws (3)

Coin flips (0)

    Not this year (0)

      Numbers are the last draw's drawn-out-at points for the chosen residency: the points held by the last applicant who drew. Codes with no drawn-out-at value for that residency are left out. Point creep can move a code up a bucket.

      Drawn-out-at = preference points held by the last successful applicant at that residency. "0 (2nd)" = the code filled with 2nd-choice applicants, so any 1st-choice applicant drew with 0 points. Success % and days/harvest are from CPW's 2025harvest survey, by hunt code.

      FAQ

      Which elk hunt codes are valid in GMU 133?
      4 limited codes in the 2026 brochure: E-E-133-O1-M (muzzleloader either, Sept. 12–20); E-F-133-O1-M (muzzleloader female, Sept. 12–20); E-F-133-L1-R (rifle female, Oct. 24–Jan. 31 Late); E-M-133-O4-R (rifle male, Nov. 18–22).
      What is the easiest elk tag to draw in GMU 133?
      E-F-133-L1-R (rifle, female, Oct. 24–Jan. 31 Late) drew out at 0 for residents and 0 for nonresidents in the 2026 draw, with 55 tags.
      How many points does it take to draw E-E-133-O1-M?
      In the 2026 primary draw the last E-E-133-O1-M tag went at 0 pts (2nd choice) resident points and 0 nonresident points. Resident history 2023–2026: 0/0/0/0; nonresident: 0/-/0/0.
      What is elk hunting success in GMU 133?
      In 2024, 85 elk hunters in GMU 133 harvested 21 animals (25% success, all seasons and weapons, CPW harvest survey).
      What does "0 pts (2nd choice)" mean?
      The hunt code filled with second-choice applicants. Every first-choice applicant drew, even with zero preference points, and the remaining licenses went to people who listed it as their second choice.